www.DemocraticFundamentalism.org - reclaiming fundamental democratic constitutional values  

Home    About    Books    Links    Government     Entertainment   HiTech   Medicine    Victims    News    Take Action

Shaping the Policies of Globalization

www.DemocraticFundamentalism.org - Shaping the Policies of Globalization - Letters to America
An invitation for people in other parts of the world to talk to Americans

Here's a chance to give Americans another point of view...  Yours!

Tell us what you think.

To submit a letter to America, send us your Name, The Country you are from, and your email address (won't be published).  Send your letter to Letters To America

QUESTIONS you might want to answer...  What do you think of U.S. Government policies?   How do you feel about the American people?  What do you think it would take for the world to live at peace.  What advice would you give to the U.S. Government, and what advice would you give to U.S. Citizens?  Constructive comments are appreciated.  Submissions become the property of www.Democratic Fundamentalism.org


Merciful God, You made all of the people of the world in Your own image and placed before us the pathway of salvation through different Preachers who claimed to have been Your Saints and Prophets. But, the contradictions in their teachings have resulted in creating divisions, hatreds and bloodshed in the world community. Millions of innocent men, women and children have so far been brutally killed by the fundamentalists who have been committing horrifying crimes against humanity, and millions more would be butchered by them in the future, if  You would not help to reunite us.

Merciful God, look with compassion on the whole human family; take away the controversial teachings of arrogance, divisions and hatreds which have badly infected our hearts; break down the walls that separate us; reunite us in bonds of love; and work through our struggle and confusion to accomplish Your purposes on earth; that, in Your good time, all nations and races may jointly serve You in justice, peace and harmony around Your heavenly throne.


Movement For Reforming Society

Lahore / Pakistan


Comments 8/2/2002 From the BBC, regarding Bush's Get Tough Corporate Policies

US president Bush has been pressurising small, developing countries into creating transparent and accountable leaderships. I suspect that a lot of people from such countries would derive great satisfaction from being able to say to him, "Clean out your own backyard first".
Sanjeev, Canada

I can't remember the last time I had confidence in a big business company. You can't get around them as they control much of what is on offer regarding food, fuels, communications and many other products, but do I trust them? No. I much prefer to find local shops run by my neighbours rather than any high street multinational. But again, there is no going around them sometimes.
Victor D, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

The real question is will the shareholders do anything? Who put the cheating CEOs in? Who set up and approved their compensation? Who is whining now? The greed goes ALL the way up, past the CEOs to the people who put them there. Bush and Congress can help, but as long as we ignore bad news and pay CEOs to lie to us, we can expect to hear lies.
Jeff, USA

Big business, corruption and fraud has been going on for years in this country. Just because Bush is the president when all of this comes out to the media doesn't make it his fault. I really think this is just the beginning. How many other businesses cook their books? I bet a whole lot more. I think Bush is a sincere man and he will help to put an end to this evil.
Eric, USA

We live in a world surrounded by conflicts of interest. The CEOs are concerned about their multimillion dollars in stock options; our politicians are consumed by dreams of re-election and the money to support to their re-election. So who do you look to take care of the little people and their little money?
G. Anschuetz, USA

We all should encourage the companies with which we choose to do business to act more ethically, especially when it comes to honest bookkeeping. Those of you reading this commentary are probably in a decision-making role, whether a large or small company, public or private. Take it upon yourself to set the moral and ethical example. Instead of somehow blaming Mr Bush for this fiasco, when was the last time you asked yourself," Is there anything I can do to help?"
Scott, Florida, USA

I'm fed up with this twisted value system

Misha Taylor, UK

Integrity is not exactly one of the President's strengths. Unfortunately, he hasn't caught up with reality on any level. He will back business to the hilt, regardless of the corruption and lies, the pollution and the exploitation. He has shown in his conduct following Sept 11 that human rights and political or personal integrity do not feature in his repertoire. I'm fed up with this twisted value system that strives for more and more money and power as an ultimate goal; it is destroying all of us.
Misha Taylor, UK

I find it rather droll that we expect a man whose own stock sales and ties to big business are so shady can even speak of corporate responsibility. That aside, however, President Bush's proposals would seem ineffectual at best, and offer no real solutions. A change in corporate culture and real public accountability is needed, not more empty words from our oily Texan head of state.
Paul, United States

The chickens are roosting and it will take much more direct effort by both the US administration and the global business community to recover investor confidence quickly. It looks as though it will be long and slow road back.
Graham Land, Croydon, UK

The question we should be asking is why has it taken the collapse of two large corporations before any action is taken. The horse has bolted. If you believe that Bush is run by big business, then presumably he wants it to be healthy, robust and producing lots of money. He realises that these corporate frauds are a seriously threat to confidence in the markets, and thus investment in US corporations.
Jonathan Michaud, USA (Ex-UK)

President Bush is the product of big business. To believe that his administration would seriously take steps to quash the greed of their corporate "buddies" would be foolish. I believe his threats are merely rhetoric and behind closed doors, those who outwardly cower from his threats are giggling alongside him.
Andrew, Canada

As long as executives' pay is linked to stock price they will do all they can to inflate that price.

Kuhan, UK

Surely Mr Bush has failed to address the wider issue of executive compensation. For as long as executives' pay is linked to stock price they will do all they can to inflate that price. The market itself is also at fault; with institutional investors happy if the price is going up and they're getting good earnings without examining the fundamentals. He also has failed to point the finger at the auditors. An audit is supposed to be a 'formal examination of an organisation financial situation'. The word audit comes from the latin 'auditus' - the act of hearing. In corporate America people only listen to the sound of dollars...
Kuhan, UK

If he would first answer questions on how he and Cheney were involved in the entire Enron collapse, it would be possible to think that he is serious. But I think his hands are far too dirty as far as US corporations are concerned. The current White House staff is far too deeply involved in the business sector to clean it up honestly.
Anonymous, Germany

I trust Bush as our president to provide leadership in this time of scandal, but I wouldn't go as far as to look to him for the answers to our problems. It goes much deeper than that. A lot of these accounting practices began to take shape during Clinton's watch, but I don't blame him either. It has to do with greed, not who is president or head of the SEC. What we must do is take our existing regulations concerning corporate and accounting practices and give them a boost with some new oversight power.
Chris, Texas USA

Does anyone really believe that big business will suddenly be staffed with scrupulous people?

Chris, US

Does anyone really believe that big business will suddenly be staffed with scrupulous people? Individuals go into business to make money, and when push comes to shove, they don¿t care if it's off someone else's back or at the expense of another "sucker" (and often push doesn't have to come to shove). Let's all have a reality check. Caveat emptor, and all that.
Chris, US

Even if Bush gets Congress to legislate what he's proposing, the other changes he wants won't happen. No one can force a corporation of any kind to drastically curtail benefits to executives or Board members, this cannot be legislated. There would have to be an across-the-board reduction in perks and benefits for company leaders, levelling the playing field. No one will take jobs with that level of responsibility for much lower compensation unless all the companies agree to this. But increasing SEC powers to include enforcement would help achieve the ends that Bush is talking about. It would take very many years but would be worth the effort.
T.P. Bland, USA

There are no new substantial penalties for corporate profiteers. All George W. Bush has done is to basically rearrange the deck chairs on the (Wall Street) Titanic.
Brian M., Canada

Mr Bush is where he is today because of only two things - his name and the help he got from "corporate America". He knows it and they know it. He would never do anything to hurt big business. Any new laws that come into place will surely be toothless tigers.
V Gill, UK

It doesn't matter whether I'm convinced or not. What matters is whether or not the market is convinced. If large institutional investors continue to believe that corporate balance sheets are suspect because the laws and regulations aren't strict enough or they aren't being enforced properly, then the market won't bounce back, the economy will suffer, and George Bush's re-election will be in jeopardy. There's an old saying in American politics - Americans vote with their pocketbooks.
Mark, USA

I trust Bush about as far as I can throw him. However there is one idea that he and his advisors have mentioned that interest me. It has been suggested that CEOs be required to sign off on the financial statements of their company, and then be held liable for any gross impropriety. I'd like to see this perpetuated to the entire "head shed", to include CFO's and the like. In the event of a catastrophic error, somebody will go to jail. That is what you call motivation.
Anon, USA

I am not convinced. He's shown a tendency to speak roughly and carry a very small stick. I've already written to my Congressman, my two Senators, and President Bush, letting them know that rhetoric will not be enough this time. Either something changes or they will. The only problem is that it's hard to threaten today's politicians while most of my fellow Americans don't seem to care enough to force their hand.
Michael Boh, California, USA

On April 9th, 2002, this was posted on the ab.politics News Group, a mostly Canadian group.

What do you think of www.democraticfundamentalism.org?  Is this the same as Liberal Socialism?  What is the Canadian view of what's going on in the U.S. and it's foreign policy.  Just curious about YOUR opinions

The response on April 12th, 2002 from GAB in Canada:

You are controlled by the same shadow government as all other once colonies of Britain,  The Crown Corporation, shareholders, are the Royalties of the past and the multi Rich, who own the world banks, and who have bribed your heads of state in 1913 to give the making of money to the Federal Reserve, and the governments borrows at interest, causing the trillion dollar debt to the world bank, our shadow government dictates to Canada, likewise, and for the same reasons.   GAB.

Editor's Notes: I was skeptical at this response, but when you do the research, it's easy to corroborate. (Posted on this site prior to this newgroup posting, these articles: Where Money Comes From  and Commanding Heights: The Battle for the World Economy)

This is a Canadian web sites' definition of a Crown Corporation:

A corporate organization established by government, but having a separate legal and organizational identity from the government itself. Crown corporations have been established in a wide variety of social and economic sectors including transportation, mining and manufacture, communication and financial services. Canada has relied heavily on crown corporations, especially as a means of stimulating economic development and meeting communications and cultural objectives.

In many ways, what this describes is what we refer to as Corporate Socialism. Now, the theory is actually sound.  Just as is the theory of Communism. (Argueable, but for the sake of arguement)

The problem, as always, is that the intent is that these entrusted corporations will act in good faith toward the consumers, otherwise called citizens.  In return, they're guaranteed maximum profits, and minimal governmental interference.  Since control and administration has been primarily granted to the corporations, recourse by the citizens then becomes primarily against the corporations, with admonishments toward the government officials, and the potential of election or un-election.

Unions, and general strikes in countries like Italy (going on now) are examples of how people have learned to communicate to their "leaders", regardless of the interpretation of who that would be, by causing or threatening financial damage if the people's needs are not met.

In large part, the corporations run utilities and large business, monopolies, on behalf of government. Government's job is then to find a way to give as much authority to the corporations balanced by their public plans/campaign promises to regulate this "free market economy", and to stave off those people who get carried away thinking their own genius is what made their company great abd all their friends millionaires, and that they now possess the answers on how to run the world.

Current U.S. examples of this would be Enron, Unocal, Andersen Accounting, Merrill Lynch... and the insurance companies that have presumably eliminated the need for universal health care by giving us such great things as HMO's.

The biggest problem I saw in reading many of the sites describing current day Crown Corporations is that what's there is more to do with the corruption of the system, and very little showing people as feeling any particular benefit.

Useful Search Engine Searches:

crown corporation

crown corporation 1913

federal reserve board 1913
kennedy gold standard
gold standard 1913
american bar association
13th amendment


(c) 2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006, 2007 DemocraticFundamentalism.org,      All Rights Reserved

Fair Use Notice: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The views expressed herein are the writers' own and not necessarily those of this site or its associates.